Given that the argument for packing the Court *assumes* that the Court otherwise lacks public legitimacy, it's a pretty big retreat to "well, maybe if we keep at it, we can erode the Court's legitimacy enough to get voters to reconsider something 58% of them disapprove of." https://twitter.com/Susan_Hennessey/status/1318550586627887109 …
-
-
You skipped right to "solution to the legitimacy crisis," assuming the *existence* of a legitimacy crisis. In fact, public trust in the Court is higher now - significantly higher - than it was before the Garland fight https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-10-07/biden-harris-should-be-honest-about-court-packing … https://twitter.com/Susan_Hennessey/status/1318558664786087950 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
Speaking of polls on the Barrett nomination & Court-packing:https://twitter.com/aedwardslevy/status/1318965971957198848?s=21 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That last question highlights how race impacts the view of court expansion. I wonder why white people would be against this, but not AAs?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We don't trust the handmaid.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
There it is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now do ACB
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why Republicans never quote polls when they are the ones burning down institutions?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.