Today in liberals who have never heard of the amendment process.https://twitter.com/RepSpeier/status/1316429328876556288 …
-
-
"Originalism" changes meaning every time conservatives apply it to achieve their desired outcome.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You are tweeting in such deliberate bad faith. Coney Barrett is being nominated specifically to nullify "changes made by the people." Republicans have nominated her solely for this task because they can't get their anti-majoritarian agenda across any other way. Shame on you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the “Bill of rights” are also amendments - they just happen to have been adopted concurrently with the Constitution
-
The Constitution was signed in 1787, ratified in 1788 with the “promise” of Bill of Rights. Those weren’t added until 1791. Not really a concurrent adoption.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's only the job of the people when people are allowed to vote which the originalists have repressed. Originalism claims would make changes virtually impossible. It's a cover for maintaining a permanent class of overlords using religious freedom as a mask for grossly unfair laws
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They also wanted a new document every 20 years, realizing the importance of keeping it as modern as possible
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
It evolves with the times, folks.