If nobody tried to stop the sharing of the NY Post story, we'd be talking right now about the NYP's journalistic standards - and fairly so. But the bar for blocking distribution of stories, on a non-content-neutral basis, is much higher. Now, the question is provable falsehood.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Their problem is it wasn’t anonymously sourced, those are allowed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It clearly to protect the Democrats
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is ill gotten gains. Honestly, I’m not sure it shouldn’t be illegal to publish emails without consent of the parties, any more than it would be phone conversations.
-
What about tax returns?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Newsflash. They can ban whatever they like
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.