Barrett corrects Harris' claim that the Court in Shelby County struck down Section 5's preclearance rule, as opposed to telling Congress that it had to cite some evidence to decide what jurisdictions were covered.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Harris rather obviously is framing these questions specifically to get Barrett to not answer them.
Show this thread -
Harris now wants judges to arbitrate questions of climate science.
Show this thread -
Barrett points out that Harris is trying to leap from an uncontroversial to a controversial point.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oops
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.