Whitehouse now against activist litigation groups & the class-action plaintiffs bar finding a plaintiff to challenge something - well, except that he's only against that if it is for a conservative cause, then he's for it.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Whitehouse now says that litigants should demand rulings in their favor by lower courts even when precedent precludes that. He should probably read about how Thurgood Marshall & Ruth Bader Ginsburg got cases to the appeals courts.
Show this thread -
Whitehouse is now denouncing Ginsburg for using a dissent to tell Congress to pass the Ledbetter Act. Just kidding, he's against Justices urging or signaling things in opinions only when they are conservative causes.
Show this thread -
What irks me about Sheldon Whitehouse is that he so very obviously believes not a word of what he says. Not one of the things he objects to bothers him when done on behalf of causes he supports.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He's not concerned about THOSE special interests!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are an ad hominem expert
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Money in politics from the right kind of people is not a problem. Sheldon can explain it, I'm sure.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh jeez, Whitehouse is beating the dead horse yet again. Poor horse.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That was always my biggest problem with my union dues back in the day. I was forced to contribute to the Democratic party by my employer. (Education)
-
No you weren’t. Law prevents union dues going to political contributions.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.