Which is not different. A precedent is a precedent unless & until it's revisited. A super-precedent is one that nobody's trying to revisit anymore & everybody agrees on. None of the people trying to pretend that Roe is one actually believe that.https://twitter.com/samstein/status/1316082301776822272 …
-
-
You can pretend, if it serves the purposes of your activism, that "super-precedent" is an actual legal category, but don't expect anyone to take you seriously.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s a bird. It’s a plane. It’s SuperPrecedent!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Loving v Virginia is not super-precedent? Virginia is free to adopt miscegenation laws again? Amy Coney Barrett would vote to hear the case, instead of ignoring it, allowing the rejection of the Fourth Circuit (properly) to remain.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.