The rules for the voters of the Supreme Court game,, have been pretty clear for 150 years: *9 seats, life tenure *Win presidential elections, you get to make nominations *Win Senate elections, you get to confirm or stop them *Divided government, you fight, maybe you compromise
-
-
Fortas is not an example for your argument. But more importantly this whole graph seems error ridden. Harlan was confirmed! But in the graph it says there was inaction. Taking a long time is not the same as inaction.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
also jewish, but your proclivities are well known
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.