Barrett: It would be unethical for me to answer that question. Feinstein: I find that distressing. Let me ask it again.
-
-
If you actually subject Roe & Casey to the legal standards for legal precedents, they crumble in the wind. That's why Democrats demand that they be treated as something higher than law & subject to promises under oath.
Show this thread -
Barrett wrote an opinion on the matter in a case. She's commenting on the opinion she wrote. https://twitter.com/JillFilipovic/status/1316011548587032576 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Give these woke blokes some time. Gravity itself's at risk from their madness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lol. That’s funny. Just wait until the religious objections start encompassing race.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And Roe came out of thin air, legally speaking. It was nearing 10 years old when we studied the case in law school, and my liberal law prof clearly thought the case had no legitimate constitutional basis. And he was one of the later signers of the Kavanaugh letter.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.