Barrett: It would be unethical for me to answer that question. Feinstein: I find that distressing. Let me ask it again.
-
-
Not surprising if you understand why people treat some precedents as untouchable: because they're now so uncontroversial that nobody is ever likely to bring a serious challenge to them again.https://twitter.com/HeidiNBC/status/1316010329709719554 …
Show this thread -
If you actually subject Roe & Casey to the legal standards for legal precedents, they crumble in the wind. That's why Democrats demand that they be treated as something higher than law & subject to promises under oath.
Show this thread -
Barrett wrote an opinion on the matter in a case. She's commenting on the opinion she wrote. https://twitter.com/JillFilipovic/status/1316011548587032576 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
especially since she has said elsewhere that Constitution >> Precedent
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.