Which reminds us that Barrett is here because voters gave Republicans an expanded Senate majority in 2018.https://twitter.com/McCormackJohn/status/1315668382612684802 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
My immediate point was the former. But obviously, I also think that the Senate is entitled to make decisions based on who the voters elect to the Senate. I start with the premise of the legitimacy of the American system.
The word "entitled" needs refinement here. If the argument is that it's perfectly legitimate for the Senate majority to do whatever it wants to do provided it technically *can* be done, then let's just have that established up front.
It sure sounds like he's saying he was fine with Harry Reid nuking the lower-court filibuster, and will have no problem when Schumer does it next year for legislation. And then passes a new VRA and expands the Court. It's what the voters elected the Senate to do, right?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.