In order to invoke the assumption that the chant will only be directed at those who commit crimes, you have to concede that Hillary Clinton committed crimes. Which is a reasonable concession, but rather off-message from prior criticisms of the chant. https://twitter.com/neeratanden/status/1188804261699837953 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted The Washington Post
Democratic crowds will chant "lock him up" on the campaign trail, and the same people who professed to be horrified in 2016 will be fine with ithttps://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1188834134979960833 …
Dan McLaughlin added,
6 replies 16 retweets 35 likesShow this thread -
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted Elizabeth Warren
Democratic crowds will chant "lock him up" on the campaign trail, and the same people who professed to be horrified in 2016 will be fine with ithttps://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1227642422907330561 …
Dan McLaughlin added,
Elizabeth WarrenVerified account @ewarrenI am the only candidate to propose an independent DOJ task force to investigate crimes by Trump administration officials. Every Democratic candidate must commit to it—so Trump officials know they will be held accountable by career prosecutors once he is out of office.Show this thread12 replies 11 retweets 41 likesShow this thread -
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted Elizabeth Warren
Democratic crowds will chant "lock him up" on the campaign trail, and the same people who professed to be horrified in 2016 will be fine with ithttps://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1230680903757815808 …
Dan McLaughlin added,
40 replies 5 retweets 34 likesShow this thread -
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted Andrew Baumann
Ah, but the argument in 2016 was that it was always bad to "call for jailing your political opponents." It was framed that was specifically to exclude discussion of the legitimate reasons people believed Hillary should be prosecuted. That was the dishonest part.https://twitter.com/abaumania/status/1231023166773813248 …
Dan McLaughlin added,
16 replies 7 retweets 37 likesShow this thread -
Those were their rules then. Live by them, or admit they were a fraud.
21 replies 4 retweets 32 likesShow this thread -
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted David Waldman-1, of Yorktown LLC™
None of these people were actually against "Lock her up" on any sort of principlehttps://twitter.com/KagroX/status/1246547500544262144 …
Dan McLaughlin added,
5 replies 13 retweets 51 likesShow this thread -
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted TheBlaze
None of these people were actually against "Lock her up" on any sort of principlehttps://twitter.com/theblaze/status/1296280820366430209 …
Dan McLaughlin added,
10 replies 15 retweets 56 likesShow this thread -
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted Daily Caller
None of these people were actually against "Lock her up" on any sort of principlehttps://twitter.com/dailycaller/status/1314660689005477894?s=21 …
Dan McLaughlin added,
1:23Daily CallerVerified account @DailyCallerOLBERMANN: “Terrorist Trump must be defeated.... and his enablers, and his supporters... and the Mike Lees, and the William Barrs... and the Kyle Rittenhouses and the Amy Coney Barrett’s must be prosecuted and convicted and removed from our society" pic.twitter.com/7oaYHfUoS16 replies 6 retweets 30 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @baseballcrank
No, that's not true. I was horrified at it in 2016, and I'm horrified at Olbermann & Co. doing it now. Why pretend that everyone is inconsistent, a hypocrite, purely tactical? What is gained, and who gains it, when you try to drag everyone down to that level?
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
You're a libertarian, Walter. The progressives are a different animal. Me, I want politicians locked up when they've committed actual, legit crimes for which they've been duly convicted. No more, no less.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.