Let’s be clear here. Confirming ACB is probably worth more than winning the election and definitely worth more than whatever marginal cost might be incurred at this point.https://twitter.com/HotlineJosh/status/1312444794900082688 …
-
-
Lol as if we aren’t already standing on the rubble
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think the hypothetical was that it cost them Senate seats, not that it made them bad people.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The Dems have told us what they'll do well before RGB passed, why would that change now?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
They’d have the power to do it under the constitution, so your characterization is flat wrong. Especially when that is the very justification as to why they should ram ACB through in light of what they did re Garland.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Where in the "law" does it say the Supreme Court must have 9 justices?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Expanding the US Supreme Court in order to obtain ideological ends is. Consider what Democrats said when their own leader tried it in 1937https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/09/voters-deserve-to-know-where-joe-biden-stands-on-court-packing/ …
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.