You should know better than to claim that Biden sees Antifa & Black Lives Matter rioters & looters as enemies of his coalition. There's a reason he ran interference for Antifa last night. There's a reason he won't condemn with any specificity.
-
-
Replying to @baseballcrank
Biden is correct. There’s no Anyifa “organization” and both DHS and the FBI—under both Trump and Obama—have represented that right wing, proto-fascist extremism is responsible, by far, for the most political violence in the country. I assume you are aware of this data.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
Just to be clear, your contention is that the majority of street violence in 2020 has been right wing?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank
My contention is that, for many years, as US government agencies have confirmed, the vast majority of political violence in the country, eg, the synagogue murders in Pittsburgh, many others incidents, have been by ultra right proto-fascists. Are you disputing this data?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @yeselson
You're ducking the question for precisely the same reason Biden keeps doing so.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank
Well, I guess I can say the same for you! Are you disputing the data—or are you unfamiliar with it—which concludes that must political violence in the US is not by Islamic extremists, ultra-leftists or other ideations but by “white power” proto fascists?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
The effort to downplay the size of the Islamist threat requires ignoring both the global & temporalk contexthttps://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-mclaughlin-nyc-terror-attack-20171102-story.html …
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @baseballcrank
Ah—so your view is it’s simply not empirically possible to believe that right wing proto-fascists are the major source of political violence in the country today. You can’t accept that data because no enemies in the right, huh?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
I can't help you if you won't even read the column or address its arguments. And you continue to claim that there is no problem on the left, & that street violence in 2020 is primarily a right-wing problem.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @baseballcrank
I read the column. And I told you that you first three reasons apply also to right wing groups. But you know nothing about third groups—or choose not to know anything g about them. Maybe you ought to feel some shame that you can’t condemn fascists, Dan.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Oh c'mon, I can't condemn fascists? How many damn times have I done so? You're not entitled to your own facts.
-
-
Replying to @baseballcrank
Show me a cite. If you’ve done yhst, I’m glad. All I know right now is that you won’t even consider the evidence—or else know nothing about it—that rightwing proto fascists are the leading source of political violence in the US. Your LA Times piece says nothing re that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yeselson
So, by "condemn" you mean "minimize other sources of violence."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.