Yeah, it doesn't make any sense if Congress repeals part of a law but not all of it that Congress' intent would be to make the provisions non-severable. Also much more evidence now that mandate was not close to a necessary leg of the stool.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Same with RvWade. Only guaranteed vote to overturn it IMO is Thomas
-
Gorsuch doesn’t care about overturning precedent either. He just ruled that half of Oklahoma is a Native American reservation.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yup. Intervening congressional action guts the plaintiffs’ argument against severability.
-
hahaha if it is highly unlikely why bring the suit at all? you guys know its dead but you don't want to say to because it will look extremely bad for the GOP. ACB is a fundamentalist hack and nothing more.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
BuT tHE peNaLtY iS rEaLlY a tAx!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True. It would have been easier to do so in 2012 before the law took effect. Now doing so would have real consequences to people currently receiving benefits from the law.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Republicans are so useless - they have had now 12 years and they can’t come up with anything better - no replacement in sight Only good at tearing things down not building !
-
The last four years have been their trial and conviction. Now it's time for sentencing
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The Court didn't invalidate Obamacare at the time because Chief Justice Roberts rightly believed that it wasn't the Court's job to overturn a major act of Congress. Only Congress should be able to do that.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.