With the end result not in doubt, the Dems really should be looking at how to make the best case to the country electorally. Not going nuts and trying to somehow thwart something they have no shot at. Act statesmanlike. Be gracious.
-
-
-
"Statesmanlike"? "Gracious"? Uh, Jay? You've seen these people in action, right, bro?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Hearings are a complete waste of time if he nominates Barrett. Dems have wind in their sails to go vote as long as the seat is vacant. Filling the seat ASAP will kill that wind almost immediately.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@VolbeckWasRight am I reading the Judiciary Cmte rules correctly that a quorum of 9 members (including 2 from the minority) is needed to vote her out of committee? Assuming the Dems just absent themselves, they can effectively give McConnell an excuse to bypass committee.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great commentary on SCOTUS - I've been following all you have been writing since RBG's death, and agree completely.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The comments to this are insane as well as the tweet. The President nominating and the Senate consenting, exactly as the Constitution prescribes, is text book definition of legitimate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
<checks dictionary> "Illigitimate" - any legitimate action taken by Republicans with which Brian Fallon disagrees. Hmmm... Guess he's right.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Didn’t they do that with last SCOTUS Nominee & Grassley said fine we’ll go on w/o you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.