On the radio with Tony Perkins in the 5pm hour.
I don't claim it is driven by precedent, merely that precedent supports the use of Senate power in each case & offers no case for restraining it.
-
-
But if you take "temperature" into account, only the Peter Daniel nomination represents support for a nomination of the sort we are about to see. If you claim that anything else does then I think you need to accept the Howell Jackson nomination as supporting restraint.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.