So Dan—did you read the quotes David French assembled today from GOP senators in 2016? You will note, or should, that the divided party rationale, which you favor, was entirely post hoc. Fine to say they can do it because they have the power—fair enough. But lots of bs then.
-
-
-
"Entirely post hoc" assumes that Mitch McConnell did *not* cite it at the time, which he did. And so did Grassley. You know this. Why pretend otherwise?pic.twitter.com/TLwBW38uDg
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Dan the Man! Danny dan danistan! When is your next article coming out?!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The seat was not intentionally held open in 1987/88. Reagan nom‘d Bork, he received a hearing & a floor vote. He was rejected by bipartisan majority. Reagan nom’d Ginsburg, who withdrew. Nom‘d Kennedy, who was confirmed. Entire process took 6 mos. Don’t pretend it was the same
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Blue check marks come very easy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm glad he agrees it shouldn't be 8 but 9...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That word (fact) does not mean what you seem to think it means.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.