"If you play by the rules and win, we will change the rules."https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1307329124541894657 …
-
-
In case you think Aslan is being metaphorical in threatening violencehttps://twitter.com/rezaaslan/status/1307133898154020864 …
Show this thread -
Exactly. We're expected to play the long game, abide by defeat after defeat even when we elect large majorities. They expect to turn over the table if they lose.https://twitter.com/RightOfLeft_TX/status/1307333196770676741 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
JVL is making an observation, not advocating this prospect. (He's correct in his assessment, too.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When the Bulwark and Dispatch people stand before the Judgment Seat, they'll be cursing and threatening God, so I don't put much stock in anything they say.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh stop, Dan. I’m fine if you just acknowledge the hypocrisy and say “elections have consequence”. But let’s not deny the hypocrisy
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
*Except when you refused to even give Merrick Garland and up or down vote Can you just admit you don’t care about the rules...when it benefits you. That’s kind of why you guys embraced the thrice married con-artist in the first place
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Adding more judges and states are perfectly within the rules and precedence as well
-
Need entire government to do it, and super majority for states.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is the "muh norms" crowd.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
