Any modestly bright person grasped my point: the epic level of projection involved in the party of subsidized abortion accusing *someone else* of baby-killing. That you missed, or pretend to miss, that point speaks volumes about progressive incapacity for good-faith engagement.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A large part of your party, which has been endorsed by the president, believes that Democrats are Satanists who eat babies. If you don't understand that reference to current politics that is you missing the point, not anyone else.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yours was never a good faith argument to begin with bucko.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's not what your point was.pic.twitter.com/q6LiVRRk4e
-
Its like reading those 1800s op eds on “A Modest Proposal” where they say the “idea was monsterous...but might be necessary.”pic.twitter.com/lRMxrgAQbT
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You're an enthusiastic member of the party that has for decades supported policies that objectively increase unplanned pregnancies & thus, quite predictably, abortions. You're fine w/ it, you just don't like the idea of. paying for it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.