A super interesting paper about SCOTUS advocacy, although I would think the insider knowledge described shows up in the briefs more than the argument -- and the paper focuses only on who had the argument. I wonder if results are sim or diff if you look at who was on the briefs.https://twitter.com/MattGrossmann/status/1305715401616240640 …
-
-
Crap, missed my window.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.