The central polemical nonsense here is that Dems “refused to accept the results” in 2016. How exactly was that manifested? Did the losing candidate not concede? Did she not attend the inauguration? Did Dem members of Congress refuse to go into session? Just vapid non truth.
-
-
-
No. What happened is that many liberals—not even party officials, although there were a few—pointed out the a system of elections in a democracy in which every vote is not equal will lead to a legitimacy crisis.But, of course they “accepted” the results. What else could they do?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"accept the results" is brilliant because it can and will also be deployed as a reason to declare a winner while the results are incomplete
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think stressed people are needlessly fretting now before the no-doubter landslides to come in November
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.