Are you trying to make the case for why people who would vote for conventional Republicans should vote for Trump? Because other than "voter suppression" that sounds like it. But you know that's not the abnormal aspects of Trump I'm talking about.https://twitter.com/yeselson/status/1302678180910772224 …
On general policy, he's joined Reaganite Rs on a lot of things, but not everything - not on trade, too far on immigration, too soft on spending, Russia. But the bulk of my disagreements are on character & competence & the proper role of govt & POTUS.
-
-
The “out of step” remains problematic. I’ve discussed trade—he’s different here for sure, but it’s just not that important to most pols and activists. Immigration-he is a full blown nativist, but that accords with most of the rank and file. “Soft on spending” is evergreen for R
-
presidents and usually congress too—Reagan was no different. What they all really care about us tax cuts for the donor class—they are malleable in spending, will trade off pentagon spending for domestic spending. Romney/McCain, the major ‘16 candidates—the same. Russia—well....
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.