There are obviously some significant omissions here, but if the union is right about the facts it claims are "undisputed," it illustrates why these kinds of cases are often not as claimed: Kenosha Police Union Releases New Details on Jacob Blake Shootinghttps://www.nationalreview.com/corner/jacob-blake-shooting-kenosha-police-union-releases-new-details/ …
-
-
Replying to @baseballcrank
Unless the lawyers on Blake’s side have withdrawn some of their contentions, how can these all be called “undisputed”?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @walterolson @baseballcrank
The available evidence presented by Wisconsin AG/DOJ seems to line up more with the union's statement than Ben Crump's, but that is the problem, the available evidence is still rather thin at least for the public.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @earldean71 @walterolson
This is the problem with digging in based on publicly available evidence before trial.
2:25 PM - 31 Aug 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.