I don't understand why people keep saying he wasn't a vigilante. Wasn't that his purpose for being there? "a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate"https://twitter.com/davidharsanyi/status/1298996915615330304 …
-
-
So if, instead of volunteering, he accepted a nominal fee, then he would no longer be a vigilante? Just trying to nail down the definition here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.