Because it's a national security issue. (Secondarily bc of decades-old issues w/Hillary & record retention). And because it's the sort of thing that, for anybody below her level in the national security world, would at minimum get their clearance pulled. https://www.nytimes.com/1999/08/21/us/former-chief-of-cia-is-stripped-of-right-to-classified-information.html …https://twitter.com/samstein/status/1298626204413702144 …
-
-
What are you saying that Hillary's emails have to do with the election? weird take, as usual
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or, conversely, how many conservatives simultaneously believe that Hillary’s emails were the most significant issue of the election and that Russia’s hacking of DNC emails were nothing of any significance.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And all those points would still matter, and have value, if the folks arguing them hadn't then elected a guy who tweets on an unsecured phone, holds nat sec conferences with allies at open dinner tables, and have family/staff regularly doing govt work on WhatsApp. But they did.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.