So, just to to summarize your position: you are sincere solely because you say so; I am insincere solely because you say so. You are in no way responsible for the ticket you're supporting; I'm responsible for any ticket I'm not actively opposing.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @shannon_last @EsotericCD and
You said "disingenuous," but if you didn't mean that, I am open to correction.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank @shannon_last and
Yeah, he never said YOU weren't sincere, but that you weren't allowing for people being sincere and coming to different political conclusions. Maybe abortion isn't enough for you to vote a certain way, but it's a legit reason for others.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @shannon_last @baseballcrank and
But didn't question your pro-life values - you jumped to that conclusion. He said "you cannot imagine anyone sincerely caring" about things like abortion. As in, enough to vote Trump. He's saying you should consider that ppl sincerely are driven by pro-life values to vote Trump.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
That was not my argument. It's twofold. One, anyone who is actually pro-life should recognize the serious reasons why people cannot support Biden-Harris. Two, any pro-lifer supporting them has a grave burden of justification, not hand-waving the Hyde amendment as no biggie.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.