Eastman's legal theory is not crackpot, but it's a fringe (& wrong) argument with no chance of being adopted. People in politics, rather than legal scholarship, should go nowhere near it because it excludes so many people from the presidency who are, in the real world, eligible.https://twitter.com/AlexNowrasteh/status/1293901515372011520 …
-
-
I have long thought that the only possible cogent argument is that children of people not lawfully in the United States could be denied birthright citizenship. But it would take action by Congress at a minimum to do that. No chance of it politically in anywhere near the future.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.