Wasn’t adding a whole bunch of sparsely populated, free, western states one of the driving factors behind the civil war?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The huge problem is that
@LemieuxLGM doesn't even know what you are talking about. These guys didn't study history.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This would be an effective criticism if this was what
@LemieuxLGM wrote. But of course it isn’t, so therefore you’ve evaded actually engaging with what he did write. -
He literally said that in his tweet. I understand that for some of you on the left, using "literally" is just a literary device, but the word does have an actual meaning.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So the non-White Supremicist thing to do would have been to prevent the expansion of states in the west and leave the former Confederate states with proportionally greater voting power in the Senate and in the House? Sounds plausible.
-
While reducing their voting power with the 14th amendment’s section 2. Did you read the thread?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Well except they aren’t going to do that. But maybe on earth B.
End of conversation
-
-
-
It’s abject idiocy, is what it is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It was just getting ahead of The Great Party Switch
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.