Stokes is neither purposefully ignorant nor illiterate. But your continued insistence on this juvenile point says a lot about your character - and your reliance on it as part of your argument says even more about the strength of your commentary.
-
-
Matt didn't engage in dishonest character assassination. You did. I'm not offended by your argument, I take offense to your suggesting Matt was "stupid" or "illiterate."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I also don't think it's fair to call Cawthorne a Nazi (that does offend) - and Stokes didn't do that. I do think it's fair to say the post wasn't a good look, as even Cawthorne admitted by deleting the post.
-
You’re way off on this one Heath. Way off.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.