Or rather, conservatives believe, deep down, that the *possibility* of electoral losses is legitimate, & the Left does not. It is not a coincidence that the original democratic transfer of power was away from a party of the Right (the Federalists). https://twitter.com/Vermeullarmine/status/1289971635311669248 …
-
-
The constitutional methodology of progressivism assumes that no electoral loss can legitimately transfer the same powers that a prior victory delivered; each win is supposed to be permanent "progress" reducing the number of questions left undecided to the voters.
Show this thread -
The most egregious example of refusing to accept a Republican president.https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/status/1290078708464664577 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That thread was dumb. What exactly was birtherism then
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Im pretty sure districts like this are not part of the idea of a constitutional democratic republic. Easy to see why your side is quicker to see legitimacypic.twitter.com/mV4J5Uxv6F
-
We live in the brief historical interval when Democrats pretend to dislike gerrymandering, especially gerrymandering commanded by their own interpretations of the VRA.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Premised on the ability to make such an argument effectively. This is why constraints on political speech and seating judges who remove controversies from political resolution on false readings of the law are the gravest issues.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.