Her job is the opposite.https://twitter.com/esquire/status/1289269346129321985 …
-
-
Absolutely agree. The only reason I say that her job is not the "opposite" of advocating change is that some "laws" are unconstitutional. If Cong adopts the "Dan McLaughlin STFU Act of 2020" then it is the job of SCOTUS to strike it down on 2 grounds 1A and Bill of Attainder
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And fortunately no people ever writes laws with words that are vague or ambiguous. Also it's always one person who's will and intent are easily discernible through a foolproof methodology. And of course, interpretive principles are *always* neutral.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.