No, it’s because she voted against allowing witnesses and evidence in an impeachment hearing. She put party before country and deserves to lose and be shamed for the rest of time. Steel cable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here in ME you see the same Collins and Gideon commercials night after night after night. Gideon's hit harder & are more effective. Collins needs to be more aggressive, like tying Gideon to the Left's agenda, or quoting her Tweet congratulating Chesa Boudin when he won his race.
-
Oh noes, please whatever you do, don't tie her to an agenda that's widely popular/polls in the vast majority. However will she recover.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's... always the reason to support a Senate candidate.
-
Those voters in Wisconsin that elected Ron Johnson in 2016, they were just Republicans that wanted large Republican majorities to pass Trump's agenda & protect him against Congressional checks on the White House. That's it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nope! That may be the result, but the reason is to remove senators/reps who enabled an unfit president in his abuses of power and refusal to work for the good of the country. They’ve proven *themselves* unfit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nevertrumpers are Democrats
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or, perhaps another reason would be to hold her accountable for her impeachment vote, which she explained the President didn’t need to be removed because: “I believe that the President has learned from this case.” and that he “...will be much more cautious in the future.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.