Also, remember that you changed the subject from "Ernst is making up a principle" to "but this thing has happened in history." You disingenuously changed the terms of debate from her normative implications to your shrug that "it happens." To take a phrase: Be better, Dan.
-
-
Oh I see Dan still doesn't argue in good faith. So shocking.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I didn't assume she's lying. I assumed she was covering her ass by taking something using an empirical fact and turning it into a normative excuse for what she'll have to do if RBG dies. Empirical vs normative. You're the law guy here, you get that difference, right?
-
I mean, you can argue that I'm imputing too much bad faith to Joni Ernst, and that's fine - although I'd like to think I learned some things watching Senators - but you're not arguing with anything I'm saying, you're just trying to do some ass-covering for her ass-covering.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I’m just not a fan of the whole ad hominem style of argumentation. Never have been.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.