This is another way of saying you do not actually believe in expertise. Be better, Tom. You were not always like this.
-
-
Could we instead ask "would a lame duck Senate hurrying through a confirmation for a lame duck president in 2020 reflect the will of the people?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1. You're still changing the subject. I wasn't speaking on SCOTUS history, but on what I think Ernst was trying to do: Invent an ass-covering principle. 2. I infer your intentions as your reader and interlocutor. 3. This convo does nothing to convince me that I am wrong about (2)
-
This is exactly what the Deep State paranoiacs do: you start by assuming Ernst must be lying, therefore when she cites a distinction grounded in historical fact, you assume it's a smoke screen for THE REAL PLOT because whatever she's saying must be a HOAX,
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.