1. The faithless-elector decision is, its legal merits aside, a healthy development for the fall elections. States can, of course, allow faithless electors, but long tradition has taught Americans & their candidates to assume that the winner of a state's vote gets its electors.
-
-
12. ...Kagan's opinion has some escape hatches talking about tradition, the power of the popular vote, other clauses in the Constitution. Its logic makes the state legislatures supreme, but maybe not unchecked:pic.twitter.com/SnJGM8IPHp
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems to me that the national vote compact would only come into effect if the national popular vote went against the popular vote of the state affected, and the citizens of that state would freak and revoke that commitment before the next big election.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.