1. The faithless-elector decision is, its legal merits aside, a healthy development for the fall elections. States can, of course, allow faithless electors, but long tradition has taught Americans & their candidates to assume that the winner of a state's vote gets its electors.
-
-
Lol!!!!! That is your blindness. As if Shelby County was not politicized by con justices. I could go on and on. Yes, a justice can always cherry pick cases and invent a doctrine, but Roberts knew the result he wanted and so did the other con justices.
-
There are endless cases like this in the modern period. Janus is a classic. The conservatives hate public sector unions and were going to find against them—which is why they took the case. The liberals support (if not like) public sector unions and were going to defend them.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Hahahahaha hahahahaha Hahaha
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.