1. The faithless-elector decision is, its legal merits aside, a healthy development for the fall elections. States can, of course, allow faithless electors, but long tradition has taught Americans & their candidates to assume that the winner of a state's vote gets its electors.
-
-
Right, that’s it. She expertly and deeply went thru the history. We can evaluate them as separate questions, but we can also choose when we are “flexible” about the law vs real life outcomes. You very much favored your view of the law in the DACA case, eg.
-
The justices realized that the risk of chaos was way too high, that possible outcome favored neither party per se, and thus there was no way in hell they would ever have found for the plaintiffs in this case.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.