He asked for the argument, Dan provided the already existing argument. You don't have to support it, but that wasn't the point of his tweet. He was providing an answer to a question to a man pretending no such argument exists.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Nor to give the Democrats two more senators for free in a city that is not going to be in play for the opposition for the next, let me guess, thousand years?
End of conversation
-
-
-
He said non-partisan. Madison was a founder of the Democratic-Republican party.pic.twitter.com/rEdsEHMa73
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Treason, or copyright. DC didn't exist when he wrote it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe a principled reason from today, when the city has 700,000 residents, and not 250 years ago when it had 3,000.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks Dan, I wouldn't have put it so nicely to someone that doesn't know their own History..
#HistotyisFundamentalThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's concerned with giving a handful of states too much influence over the federal government...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.