In abortion case, Roberts does what no liberal Justice would do on a hot-button social-issue case: accept a wrongly decided precedent as binding. What's mine is mine, what's yours is negotiable.
I just find it odd that you're not familiar with the point about how completely it overhauled Roe in the name of stare decisis. It's a central point of Scalia's famous dissent.
-
-
Of course, I’m familiar with it. That is the famous compromise the three centrist justices (for lack of a better term) worked out. But your claim is that it is a “repeal” of Roe. That’s just wrong, lest we wouldn’t be arguing about June Medical Services.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.