1. This sort of thing gets to my quarrel with the term "white privilege," as if the protection of the laws is a bad thing we should dispense with, rather than a right we should expand & guarantee on an equal basis.https://twitter.com/EddieZipperer/status/1269951088964370432 …
-
0:53Show this thread -
2. America was founded on what the Founding Fathers saw as the natural rights of all Englishmen - but with the twist of defining those rights as God-given & universal to all.
1 reply 12 retweets 89 likesShow this thread -
3. Nothing is more central to America than the natural rights of individuals. The long American debate has been about expanding those rights from universal in theory to universal in practice. Reframing them as privilege - a privilege it is unjust to enjoy - opposes all that.
1 reply 30 retweets 125 likesShow this thread -
4. One of the corrosive things about slavery in the world of political ideas was how it increasingly made its defenders skeptical of claims of universal rights, precisely because they implied that those rights should not be white privileges. Example:
1 reply 10 retweets 59 likesShow this thread -
5. After the failed 1848 revolutions, Whigs & Northern Democrats honored Lajos Kossuth, the Hungarian republican leader. Lewis Cass authored a resolution denouncing Austrian & Russian repression. Sec. State Daniel Webster wrote a pro-Kossuth biography.
1 reply 4 retweets 41 likesShow this thread -
6. But Kossuth was received coolly in the South. Sen. Robert MT Hunter (D-VA, later a Confederate) complained that Cass was meddling in Austria's internal affairs. Hunter feared embracing even universal *white* republicanism due to its implications for slavery.
2 replies 4 retweets 42 likesShow this thread -
7. Hunter & other Calhounist apologists had fallen far from the visions of even Founding-era slaveholders - rather than proclaim & principle & admit it then had exceptions in practice, they drifted towards letting the practice redefine & water down the principle.
1 reply 5 retweets 41 likesShow this thread -
8. It is literally un-American & anti-American to view the natural rights of all human beings as unjust privileges to be renounced. That way does not lie liberty or equality, but merely a Hobbesian test of strength. I want no part of it.
9 replies 32 retweets 135 likesShow this thread
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted Aaron Astor
9. Precisely. The Cornerstone speech & the "mudsills" theory were all about claiming that liberty could exist only as a racial privilege for some at the expense of others, not a right for all. That was the struggle over the meaning of republicanism underlying the Civil War.https://twitter.com/AstorAaron/status/1270016935389024256 …
Dan McLaughlin added,
-
-
Replying to @baseballcrank
By insisting the imperfect recognition of universal human rights constitutes "privilege" for those for who receive a more complete recognition of these rights, progressives lay the rhetorical groundwork for their removal.After all, privileges can be revoked for abuse, can't they?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.