Social media companies w/huge market shares becoming non-neutral arbiters of content is bad for freedom of speech as a social value & a practical reality. The dilemma is that stopping them gets the government - which is hard to trust with such matters - deeper into speech rules.
-
-
Show this thread
-
But I reject the view that the difficulty of a solution means we should pretend there is not a problem.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No, it is not compelled speech. It is a response to speech. You're smarter than that, Dan. But, as usual, you're far more interested in supporting your party than being honest.
-
Yeah, it’s a terrible analogy. Is Ben saying it would be compelled speech if the government *made* Twitter include that link? I suppose. But Twitter is doing this on its own. There’s no compulsion here. The comparison makes no sense.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.