What I find persistently lacking in non-originalist alternatives is a determinable methodological baseline against which one could criticize a non-originalist interpretation for departing from its method, in the way that an originalist analysis can be.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
But what about Crank's point that, rather than "mendaciously," originalism at least has a limiting principle by which it can be judged? Even if we accept arguendo that both sides are "interpreting" the same basic ways, doesn't having some criterion consitute a kind of method?
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.