You mean "admits," not "claims"
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Which returns us to the question - as yet unanswered - of whether you contend that 1) you are arguing for something that *is* a method in the way that originalism claims to be, or that 2) a method is impossible - i.e., that constitutional decisionmaking is inevitably malleable.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.