Deeply confused by this @CassSunstein column. The argument that originalism is required by the oath of office is not a particularly novel claim. It has bounced around originalist legal scholarship for many years now. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-05-15/is-the-constitution-a-living-document-supreme-court-can-decide …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Of course, originalism in practice amounts to amateur historical work performed by clerks fresh out of law school, so originalism consistently falls short of this baseline you claim for it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.