A presidential election *is* a binary choice, in terms of its likely outcome, so "compare the two options" is a legitimate argument. But it is no excuse for just refusing to consider a candidate's glaring flaws.
-
-
Show this thread
-
The ultimate question is whether one candidate winning is better/worse than the other candidate winning. A third party/protest vote is a statement that both options are equally good/bad/intolerable. But the question is comparative. Not just "the other guy is bad."
Show this thread -
Not to pick on any of these responses individually, but they neatly illustrate how different people process what goes into the voting decision differently.pic.twitter.com/sXRLcW2uZH
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It doesn't concern me because Biden is neither mentally nor morally unfit for the job.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I still come back to the Obama admin executing US citizens without them standing trial and Biden being cool with it if not part of the process.
-
Really? I come back to Trump's romance with the murderer of Otto Warmbier; a US citizen who unlike Al-Awlaki was most definitely not one of the world's leading terrorists at the time of his death.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Well hopefully Biden will select Kamala Harris so they can have both covered.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You do understand that most of the people voting for these 2 don't believe that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
