Except liberal justices will likely have records that terrify a vast majority of the country if focused on with proper scrutiny. Constitutional Justices at worst say no to things.
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Then write up a list of excuses McConnell will use for not having hearings on any of them.
-
1. He has the majority; 2. Nothing else matters.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
There would be (at least) one almost immediately. Assuming 50 Dem Senators, of course.
End of conversation
-
-
-
The SCOTUS nominations list was one of the best things Trump did. And the result was really good nominees, not spur of the moment ones.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Congrats, you got your "pro-life" judges and 50,000+ deaths.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cannot wait for the “true conservative” never Trumpers to lead the charge on liberal progressive SCOTUS nominations. So many principles
@DavidAFrench@BillKristol@secupp@NumbersMuncherThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am not sure about that. A Democrat list might do more to scare GOP voters than motivate Democrat voters, most of whom don't seem as driven by the intersectional, progressive demands of the left fringe.
-
I'm not saying it would necessarily be good politics; that's debatable. I'm saying from a neutral standpoint it would be a good thing for the voters to see. And it *might* be good politics.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.