We just spent *$2 trillion,* and the package was premised on substituting for income the government forced people to forego. Are we expecting lockdowns to be continuing in January? https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/coronavirus-rel-ef-adam-serwer-stimulus-fantasy/ … https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/03/the-coronavirus-relief-package-isnt-socialism/ …https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1250811392342581249 …
-
-
Yes, at which point we likely will have spent many more trillions beyond CARES and Fed support and probably will require still more if you want a V shaped recovery. Bear in mind we may be facing a second resurgence then and almost no way we have a vaccine for some time after that
-
When they say this is a WW II style mobilization, they’re not joking around. This is going to take years.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The tweet is saying that a Republican legislature is willing to run deficits if there is a Republican executive. If the executive is a Democrat, they suddenly oppose deficits.
-
In fact, Daniel, prior to Covid tRump grew the deficit 15% or THREE TRILLION DOLLARS. He was running annual deficits bigger than the debt-lover OBAMAs! Prior to Covid our debt grew to $23 TRILLION and former conservatives like Dan never said a word. Remember Grover Nordquist?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They would have opposed the $2 trillion of Obama was still pres
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, the premise is that they will regardless of circumstances, which is irrefutable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.