Not sure this is a good decision, but it was basically a reaction to the District Court. As in Bush v Gore, things get dicey when SCOTUS is asked to review a state election law written by a court, rather than by a legislature.https://twitter.com/WSJMattD4/status/1247304424894185474 …
-
-
This is, in any situation, not conducive to good judicial decisionmaking, particularly when the Justices can't even sit in the same room. Thus, a sloppy decision & an essentially lawless dissent.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No we have a controlling party with all control using the pandemic to ensure suppressed voting.
-
And gerrymandering ensures no blowback for them politically
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I am pretty sure the Democrats wanted this to be resolved by the political process
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The gop legislature has no interest in resolving it and gerrymandering in WI has and will keep them in power meaning even the voters can’t remedy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The legislature is living within the rules as written. The governor, today, tried to take some control of the election process. 5 days ago he said he didn't have the power to do what he tried to do today. He was right...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Nobody trying time resolve it through the political process” = Wisconsin legislature not accepting any Dem proposal to reschedule an obviously dangerous election date
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.