Not sure this is a good decision, but it was basically a reaction to the District Court. As in Bush v Gore, things get dicey when SCOTUS is asked to review a state election law written by a court, rather than by a legislature.https://twitter.com/WSJMattD4/status/1247304424894185474 …
-
-
The unsigned opinion eviscerates Ginsburg's dissent for just totally ignoring the evidence & the procedural posturepic.twitter.com/ogQnGPlJCJ
Show this thread -
The better decision in any sane situation would be to tell the legislature to live with the rules as written or fix them. Unfortunately, we have the Court getting the case the night before Election Day with a pandemic ongoing & nobody trying to resolve thru the political process.
Show this thread -
This is, in any situation, not conducive to good judicial decisionmaking, particularly when the Justices can't even sit in the same room. Thus, a sloppy decision & an essentially lawless dissent.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are really going to both sides this aren’t you?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can't return a ballot that you haven't received.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What bothers me is that the conservative justices don’t seem to understand that unless they can unify the Court they do more damage to the Court by not just staying out.
-
Staying out means a single judge rewrites the law.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.