Not sure this is a good decision, but it was basically a reaction to the District Court. As in Bush v Gore, things get dicey when SCOTUS is asked to review a state election law written by a court, rather than by a legislature.https://twitter.com/WSJMattD4/status/1247304424894185474 …
-
-
Right. The Court is inventing a law out of whole cloth to allow more votes to be counted. It got stuck in that position due to a long train of bad decisions by Gov. Evers, WI legislators, the lower courts, & the litigants.https://twitter.com/POLITICO_Steve/status/1247307174365323264 …
Show this thread -
The unsigned opinion eviscerates Ginsburg's dissent for just totally ignoring the evidence & the procedural posturepic.twitter.com/ogQnGPlJCJ
Show this thread -
The better decision in any sane situation would be to tell the legislature to live with the rules as written or fix them. Unfortunately, we have the Court getting the case the night before Election Day with a pandemic ongoing & nobody trying to resolve thru the political process.
Show this thread -
This is, in any situation, not conducive to good judicial decisionmaking, particularly when the Justices can't even sit in the same room. Thus, a sloppy decision & an essentially lawless dissent.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What do you expect from a racist party that is supported by people who don’t care about that part as long they get to stack the courts?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.